That seems like a reasonable defense if F-35 part losses are on par with or better than those for other aircraft. In other words, while the absolute value may seem large because the F-35 program is so big-with as many as 3,000 eventually expected to be assembled-it’s not a high percentage of the total part inventory. Historically, Lockheed has often sought to beat back the Pentagon’s attempts to acquire more data and control over F-35 logistics, due to what the company views as being its intellectual property.Ī spokesperson for the JPO argued in their defense that while the number of missing parts and their price tag may seem high, they amount to a loss rate of one percent, and that this rate is actually decent given that the federal government’s minimum required standard was 95% inventory accuracy (ie. Lockheed-Martin argues that the level of reporting its providing the JPO already fulfills its contractual requirements, but says it’s working on a solution to integrate its own inventory records with GFP Module anyway. As a result, the Defense Department lacks exact data on how many parts are out there, where they’re located, and what they’re worth. However, the government’s Joint Program Office (JPO) for the F-35 doesn’t have any sort of master inventory of F-35 parts in its Government Furnished Property (GFP) Module tracking system. government considers itself the owner of F-35 parts right up until the moment they are installed in another country’s aircraft. There’s also some implied disagreement on how big a deal missing millions of dollars of spare parts truly is. Why the F-35 Fighter Jet Is Such a Badass PlaneĪpparently, this problem is coming to the forefront because the Pentagon and Lockheed simply don’t have any sort of comprehensive system to track spare parts.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |